Music of the Heart (Meryl Streep)

We saw the 1999 film ‘Music of the Heart’ back in 2009, and watched it again only four years later. But it was definitely time to re-watch. I recalled finding it a moving and extremely well-done film, and that it was based on a true story. But, as ever, we had both forgotten most of the detail.  We watched it again last night, and enjoyed it just as much - possibly even more, as we had at least a general idea of how it would end.

Meryl Streep stars, brilliantly as ever, as a young woman called Roberta. We meet her when she’s in tears, beginning to realise that her straying husband is not going to return. She has two sons, Nick and Lexy, and they are staying with her mother (Cloris Leachman) temporarily. But that really isn’t working out. Roberta manages to find a job in a shop, and there she meets Brian (Aidan Quinn)  an old school-friend, who says he always liked her but she was never attainable. 

They have coffee together, and talk about what they have been doing. Brian remembers Roberta as an excellent musician, and comes up with the idea of her going to teach violin at a struggling primary school in Harlem. She has to push quite hard to be offered a temporary post, but although the music coordinator is not sympathetic, the school Head (Angela Bassett) is.

It’s a struggle at first, trying to find the right way to relate to a very mixed group of children, many of whom have no knowledge of music, and little interest in playing. Roberta comes up against the prejudice of not just the music coordinator but others of the staff, and some of the parents, too. But gradually she eases her way into the hearts of her students, and even convinces some of the parents of the value of music to their children. There’s a very moving scene when they give their first concert: just simple renditions of well-known pieces, but played beautifully. 

The action then moves forwards ten years. Roberta’s programme has become so popular that there’s a lottery for children who hope to be part of it. And then the school district decides to cut out extra music, to save money. But she’s determined to fight this, and comes up with the idea of a fund-raising concert…

The ending is quite exciting; less stressful than it was for me the first time around, since I knew what was coming, but still I was gripped, caught up in the action, rooting for Roberta and her students, thrilled by the conclusion - and the brief text at the end that explains how the film was based on a true story.

Meryl Streep is the main reason we were so drawn into this film: she doesn’t just act, she becomes the characters she plays, to the extent that we quite forget about the actress during her films. Apparently she spent two months learning to play the violin to this level, working six hours per day, as she did all the playing herself. 

But she’s not the only one: her sons, both as their younger selves and their older teenage selves, played by a different pair of actors, are believable, talented and with great chemistry. And the children Roberta teaches are also excellent. I don’t know where they came from - perhaps some of them were children taught by the real Roberta, or maybe they came from another music school. Wherever they were found, they were superb, not just at playing (initially badly, eventually extremely well) but also in their characterisation and interactions with each other and Roberta.

We thought it a wonderful film, all the more so for seeing it again, and I hope we’ll watch it again in another five or six years. The rating is PG, which seems about right; only mild bad language, only mild violence, and the only implied scene of intimacy shows nothing other than Roberta covered with a sheet in the morning, concerned that her boys might have heard something. 

The romantic threads are very low-key, and there are some light-hearted touches here and there which made us smile. But overall it’s an uplifting, moving and ultimately encouraging film about the power of music in children’s lives, and one ordinary, but determined woman who inspired so many. 

Very highly recommended.

Review copyright 2020 Sue's DVD Reviews

The Prince and Me (Julia Stiles)

We saw the 2004 film ‘The Prince and Me’ early in 2013 and had entirely forgotten what it was about. But the box said it was uplifting and ‘feel-good’, so it seemed like a good DVD to re-watch. 

Julia Stiles is Paige, the main protagonist. She’s a hard working college student in the United States, hoping eventually to train as a doctor. She’s taking mostly science classes, and works in a bar to earn a bit of money. She’s more geeky than some of her friends, but likes to have fun too. She comes from a farm, with a loving and welcoming family. 

Luke Mably is Eddy, who just happens to be the Crown Prince of Denmark. He’s a fast-driving womaniser who has little interest in politics or running his country, rather to the despair of his parents (Miranda Richardson and James Fox). He keeps trying different things, determined to ‘find himself’, but ends up in disgrace time and again. 

Eddy happens to see a TV show about a university in the US where women routinely take their tops off - or so it seems. So he tells his parents he wants to study at this university. They agree unwillingly, and he says he will fund himself. Their only requirement is that Soren, his minder (Ben Miller) goes with him.

Eddy and Soren are rather unimpressed with student accommodation, particularly when they learn that they have to share a room with another student. Eddy wants to be incognito and insists that Soren stop addressing him as ‘your majesty’. But Soren keeps calling him ‘sir’, and cooks his breakfast in the room… although for some reason nobody seems to find this anything other than quirky. 

When Eddy and Paige meet, it’s in a conflict scenario, as in traditional light romantic stories, and it takes a while for him to persuade her that he really does like her, and is not such a jerk as he appears. And their romance follows a fairly predictable path until they’re tracked down by the paparazzi….

The two main characters are okay, though I’m not sure I found either of them particularly believable. I didn’t quite understand why Eddy’s parents were so old - or at least late middle-aged, with his father in failing health - when he’s probably meant to be around thirty. My favourite character, however, was Soren. His expressions - mostly deadpan - and lines are excellent, with perfect timing. His role lifted the film out of the average, into something we enjoyed very much.

There’s a slightly strange interlude in the middle of the film where Eddy - whose main talent appears to be mechanical - adapts some lawnmowers to take part in a race. One of the extras on the DVD explains that lawnmower racing is a real thing in many countries. 

There are one or two interesting issues explored in the film, relating to the duties of royalty, and how much personality a person can keep if they are going to become King or Queen. But since that’s not likely to apply to the vast majority of viewers, and the utter discipline and subjugation of the will isn’t necessary for most careers or roles, it’s more of passing interest than anything deep or thought-provoking. Still, the balance of career and romance is nicely done, and Paige is a strong character, a good role model for some of today’s teens. 

Overall we thought it a nicely done light-weight film. It’s PG in rating so entirely clean, with a predictable but satisfying ending. Suitable for all the family, although I doubt if small children would find it very interesting. And while nothing explicit happens, there’s rather a lot of passionate kissing, which would not appeal to many young children or pre-teens.

Still, we enjoyed it, and will probably see it again in another six or seven years.

Review copyright 2020 Sue's DVD Reviews

Room with a View (Helena Bonham-Carter)

We first saw the Oscar-winning film ‘Room with a View’ at the cinema in the 1980s, and I liked it very much. However it was many years before we acquired it on DVD.  We watched it in 2007 and for some reason have not seen it again since then - until last night. We recalled the story, in general terms - it’s based on a book by EM Forster of the same name - but as ever, had forgotten many of the details.

The story is set in the Edwardian period, early in the 20th century. Lucy (a very young looking Helena Bonham Carter) is in a hotel in Florence when we first meet her. She’s accompanied by her rather strait-laced cousin Charlotte, whom we were delighted to realise was played by Maggie Smith. I had remembered that Judi Dench features, as a rather risqué writer (for the era), who was also staying there, but had quite forgotten about Maggie Smith in this rather important role. 

Charlotte is bemoaning the fact that their rooms do not have a good view, although Lucy is trying to keep her quiet. They are overheard by Mr Emerson (Denholm Elliot), who offers - in a rather pushy way - to switch rooms with them, as he and his son, he insists, have no need of a view. Charlotte is horrified and embarrassed at this, but is persuaded by a clergyman friend, Mr Beebe (Simon Callow) who just happens to be there too, that it would be fine to accept the offer. 

Mr Emerson’s son George (Julian Sands) is something of a free spirit, and falls for Lucy. He assists her when she sees an unpleasant fight, and she’s appreciative. But when they go on a drive and he kisses her, she is shocked; Charlotte even more so, when she comes across them. 

The story moves to the UK, where, by a series of coincidences, Mr Emerson and George become neighbours of Lucy and her family. But Lucy has just got engaged to a young man called Cecil (Daniel Day Lewis) although it’s hard to imagine why; he’s brilliantly portrayed as an unbelievably dull and self-centred person who really wants to marry Lucy for his own sake, as she’s young and attractive….

With such a high quality cast, it’s not surprising that the film is very watchable, with an excellent pace and authentic scenery. There’s humour here and there - not just in the caricatured Cecil, but in a scene which we couldn’t possibly forget, in which two young men (and one not-so-young) decide to bathe in a local lake… without any swimwear. 

I remember being a tad surprised that the film is rated PG as there is quite a bit of nudity portrayed in this scene; however it’s all in the context of humour with nothing remotely sexual about it. More concerning is the fight scene early in the film which has a lot of blood, and which causes Lucy to faint (and me to turn my head away). I suspect a rating nowadays would put this at 12 (as it is in several countries). Having said that, there’s no bad language, and not even a hint of a bedroom scene. 

It’s unlikely to appeal to a child anyway; it’s a brilliant production, but there’s not a great deal of plot. So it will only really be of interest to those who like classic period drama, including older teenagers.  It's a comedy of manners, in a refined kind of way, but it's also, essentially, a love story.

‘Room with a View’ is nearly two hours long, but I was fully absorbed and enjoyed it very much. I even laughed aloud a couple of times. I hope we’ll watch it again in another decade or so, or possibly even sooner.

Review copyright 2020 Sue's DVD Reviews